The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter,Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II SafetyStudies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for theTreatment of Moderate to Severe GlabellarLines in Adult Patients
Updated: May 24, 2024
Z. Paul Lorenc, MD, FACS; Jeffrey M. Adelglass, MD, FACS;
Rui L. Avelar, MD; Leslie Baumann, MD; Kenneth R. Beer, MD;
Joel L. Cohen, MD; Sue Ellen Cox, MD; Steven H. Dayan, MD;
Jeffrey S. Dover, MD; Jeanine B. Downie, MD; Zoe Diana Draelos, MD;
Mitchel P. Goldman, MD; John E. Gross, MD, FACS; John H. Joseph,
MD; Joely Kaufman-Janette, MD; Ronald L. Moy, MD; Mark Nestor, MD;
Joel Thomas Schlessinger, MD; Stacy R. Smith, MD; Robert A. Weiss, MD
Abstract
Background: PrabotulinumtoxinA is a 900-kDa botulinum toxin type A produced by Clostridium botulinum.
Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines.
Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, 1-year phase II safety study. Adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown, as independently assessed by both investigator and patient on the validated 4-point photonumeric Glabellar Line Scale (0 = no lines, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), were enrolled. On day 0, patients received an initial treatment (IT) of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA (4 U/0.1 mL final vacuum-dried formulation injected into 5 glabellar sites). On and after day 90, patients received a repeat treatment (RT) if their Glabellar Line Scale score was ≥2 at maximum frown by investigator assessment. Safety outcomes were evaluated throughout the study.
Results: The 570 study patients received a median total dose of 60 U, that is, 3 treatments. Sixty-one patients (10.7%) experienced adverse events (AEs) assessed as possibly study drug related; 6.5% experienced study drug–related AEs after the IT. With each RT, progressively lower percentages of patients experienced study drug–related AEs. Eight patients




Mình thỉnh thoảng cũng lướt mấy bài phân tích xổ số miền Bắc cho vui thôi, kiểu đọc để xem người ta suy luận thế nào chứ không đặt niềm tin 100%. Hồi trước toàn nghe bạn bè nói miệng, thấy ai bảo “cầu ngon” là mình ghi đại, nhưng trật vài lần liên tiếp nên bắt đầu để ý hơn tới thống kê và cách giải thích. Có bữa tình cờ đọc một bài trên soicauxsmb.pro, mình mới thấy nhiều “cầu” thực ra chỉ là nhìn lại dữ liệu theo cảm giác, nên mình tự hạ kỳ vọng xuống. Từ đó mình coi việc xem số như giải trí nhẹ nhàng, có chọn thì chọn ít, coi như thử…